Rule set sha256:8425ad0448a8
rego-art6-3-001
One rule of the rule set with digest 8425ad0448a8b5d482b8dabfc7bdd33c8c32cbd5f3b9c1e36e71a8a905fbd467. An audit record that names this digest and this rule was decided by the rule as shown here. Every rule in this set.
rules/rego/complyedge/article6/art6_3_procedural_derogation.rego
- Citation
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 6(3)
- Condition
- An Annex III system is not high-risk where it performs a narrow procedural task, improves a previously completed human activity, detects decision patterns without replacing human assessment, or performs a preparatory task. Claiming the derogation while describing substantive automated decisioning (replacing human assessment on credit, hiring, benefits, etc.) is a misclassification risk.
- Layer 1 detects
- within one line and in this order, "not high-risk" (also "high risk"), "6(3)" or "narrow procedural", then replace (any ending) followed by "human", or automated (any ending) followed by credit, loan, hiring, recruit, welfare, benefit or insurance and then "decision"; claim, assert or invoke, then "6(3)", "narrow procedural task" or "preparatory task", then "without human" oversight, review or assessment, or "fully automat"; and derogat (any ending), then "annex iii", then "credit scor", creditworthiness, "hiring decision" or "insurance pricing". It matches wording, not meaning: it misses a misclassification told in other words, and it fires on a text that claims the derogation and says the system does not replace human assessment ("Our CV parser is not high-risk under Article 6(3): it only converts resumes into structured fields and does not replace human assessment; recruiters make every decision."). Whether the derogation is claimed for a system that does replace human assessment is judged in Layer 2.
- Condition type
- deterministic
- Status in the file
- approved