Rule set sha256:a7e715b79299
rego-art15-4-001
One rule of the rule set with digest a7e715b792994b004a7cc9714100077fad036164172ce42812ed396af0b727f5. An audit record that names this digest and this rule was decided by the rule as shown here. Every rule in this set.
| Rule | rego-art15-4-001 |
|---|---|
| Rule version | 56d091506a9273fdc012884276dd973e50ae0fdc90369f29951c1e678f9ea8c8 |
| Provision | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 15(4) ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/art_15/par_4/oj |
| Approval | Approved Approved by Leo Celis on 2026-10-22 (via agent review per §5.1 amendment v1.1) |
rules/rego/complyedge/highrisk/art15_robustness.rego
- Citation
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 15(4)
- Condition
- Releasing a high-risk AI system with no robustness testing, redundancy or fail-safe design, or an instruction to remove them.
- Layer 1 detects
- "without" or "no", directly followed by "robustness", "resilience", "fail-safe" (with a hyphen, a space or as one word) or "redundancy", and then a space, so the word must not end the sentence ("no robustness testing", "without redundancy for the nodes"); and "not resilient against" or "not resilient to", then "errors", "faults" or "inconsistencies", or "resilient against" or "to" one of those followed, with only spaces between, by "false" or "no" and then punctuation or the end of the text. It matches wording, not meaning: it misses the practice told in other words, it does not read whether the text is about an AI system, and it fires on text that only names the practice or uses the words in another sense ("no redundancy in the team"). Whether a text does the practice is judged in Layer 2.
- Condition type
- deterministic
- Status in the file
- approved