Rule set sha256:a7e715b79299

rego-art27-001

One rule of the rule set with digest a7e715b792994b004a7cc9714100077fad036164172ce42812ed396af0b727f5. An audit record that names this digest and this rule was decided by the rule as shown here. Every rule in this set.

Rulerego-art27-001
Rule version8f2f4e58e1dd299b1e1257dd3795df3fabfdb4abbe1b3203e2e0632959d56593
ProvisionRegulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 27(1)
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/art_27/par_1/oj
ApprovalApproved
Approved by Leo Celis on 2026-10-22 (via agent review per §5.1 amendment v1.1)

rules/rego/complyedge/highrisk/art27_fria.rego

Citation
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 27(1)
Condition
A deployer putting a high-risk AI system into use without first carrying out the fundamental rights impact assessment Article 27 requires.
Layer 1 detects
"without", "no" or a word starting "skip", then "fundamental right" or "fundamental rights" optional, then "impact assessment"; and "no" or "without", then "FRIA" or "fundamental right(s) assessment" or "fundamental right(s) impact assessment", then "for" optional, then "high-risk" or "deployment". It matches wording, not meaning: it misses the practice told in other words, it does not read whether the deployer is one Article 27 covers, and it fires on any "no impact assessment", including one about another kind of assessment such as a data protection one, and on text that only names the practice, such as a refusal. Whether a text does the practice is judged in Layer 2.
Condition type
deterministic
Status in the file
approved