Rule set sha256:c63def17fac2
rego-art6-3-001
One rule of the rule set with digest c63def17fac2df12ab70941d8fcb7678e9a670479ea0d6dce87e7ddd4dc96079. An audit record that names this digest and this rule was decided by the rule as shown here. Every rule in this set.
| Rule | rego-art6-3-001 |
|---|---|
| Rule version | 59fdd52884669dc119dcec6247fdd0cd1486368df3c67c6dd2f56680eb209095 |
| Provision | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 6(3) ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/art_6/par_3/oj |
| Approval | Approved Approved by Leo Celis on 2026-10-22 (via agent review per §5.1 amendment v1.1) |
rules/rego/complyedge/article6/art6_3_procedural_derogation.rego
- Citation
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 6(3)
- Condition
- An Annex III system is not high-risk where it performs a narrow procedural task, improves a previously completed human activity, detects decision patterns without replacing human assessment, or performs a preparatory task. Claiming the derogation while describing substantive automated decisioning (replacing human assessment on credit, hiring, benefits, etc.) is a misclassification risk.
- Layer 1 detects
- within one line and in this order, "not high-risk" (also "high risk"), "6(3)" or "narrow procedural", then replace (any ending) followed by "human", or automated (any ending) followed by credit, loan, hiring, recruit, welfare, benefit or insurance and then "decision"; claim, assert or invoke, then "6(3)", "narrow procedural task" or "preparatory task", then "without human" oversight, review or assessment, or "fully automat"; and derogat (any ending), then "annex iii", then "credit scor", creditworthiness, "hiring decision" or "insurance pricing". It matches wording, not meaning: it misses a misclassification told in other words, and it fires on a text that claims the derogation and says the system does not replace human assessment ("Our CV parser is not high-risk under Article 6(3): it only converts resumes into structured fields and does not replace human assessment; recruiters make every decision."). Whether the derogation is claimed for a system that does replace human assessment is judged in Layer 2.
- Condition type
- deterministic
- Status in the file
- approved