Rule set sha256:ced554567772
EU_AI_ACT_ART9_RISK_MANAGEMENT_001
One rule of the rule set with digest ced554567772bc778cb2c7761a23d2775e31500d6b0d887c23c750017ee02779. An audit record that names this digest and this rule was decided by the rule as shown here. Every rule in this set.
| Rule | EU_AI_ACT_ART9_RISK_MANAGEMENT_001 |
|---|---|
| Rule version | 4f42ccff853ee98f9e83df9f754d81d95f1c57015d910379605c4b27828a814f |
| Provision | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 9(1) and (2) ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/art_9/oj |
| Approval | Not approved |
rules/regulations/eu/eu_ai_act_article9_risk_management.yaml
- Citation
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 9(1): A risk management system shall be established, implemented, documented and maintained in relation to high-risk AI systems. Article 9(2), first sentence: The risk management system shall be understood as a continuous iterative process planned and run throughout the entire lifecycle of a high-risk AI system, requiring regular systematic review and updating.
- Condition
- Requires establishing, implementing, documenting, and maintaining a continuous risk management system throughout the lifecycle of high-risk AI systems, covering identification, estimation, evaluation, and mitigation of risks to health, safety, or fundamental rights. Article 9.
- Layer 1 detects
- "without risk management"; no risk management or assessment system, process or plan; skip or skipping risk management or assessment; risk management not required, needed or implemented; bypass or bypassing risk management or assessment; deploy or deploying without risk; high-risk (also "high risk"), optionally followed by AI and system, then "without risk" or "without lifecycle"; no continuous or iterative risk or monitoring; residual risk not assessed, acceptable or evaluated; unmitigated risk or hazard; and risk identification or evaluation not performed or conducted. It matches wording, not meaning: it misses the practice told in other words ("Ship the credit scoring model to production today; we will write up the hazard analysis some time after launch."), it does not read whether the system is high-risk, and it fires on text that only names a missing risk process, such as an audit finding. Whether a text does the practice is judged in Layer 2.
- Condition type
- regex; semantic condition in the file, not run by the engine
- Status in the file
- review